SAPP wants Nurul Izzah barred from entering Sabah

The PKR vice-president has hurt the sensitivity of the Sabah people who had lost their loved ones during the intrusion by the Sulu sultan's soldiers in the state, says its president.

KOTA KINABALU: Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP) vice president Japiril Suhaimin wants the state government to bar PKR vice-president Nurul Izzah Anwar from entering Sabah following her meeting with princess Jacel Jamalul Kiram, the daughter of the Sulu Sultan.

Japiril said this in a Facebook posting following Nurul’s meeting with the princess who was the spokesperson for Sultan Kiram during the Lahad Datu armed intrusion by soldiers from the Sulu Sultanate in 2013.

“Nurul Izzah has hurt the sensitivity of the people of Sabah who had lost their loved ones during the intrusion by soldiers loyal to Jamalul Kiram during the armed battle with Malaysian security forces in Tanduo. Stop her from entering Sabah,” he said.

One comment received on Facebook urged all PKR reps in Sabah to stop supporting the party.

“If Nurul Izzah remains in contact with Princess Jacel, all reps in Sabah must quit PKR and don’t expect the people of Sabah to support the party,” said Mohd Norazman Injah.

“Say No to PKR,” said another posting on Facebook.

Several pictures of Nurul Izzah and Princess Jacel were uploaded in social media and have gone viral, drawing criticism.

Source: Free Malaysia Today

Read More

Jambun: Seek point of law ruling on Nurul

Sabah, Sarawak and Malaya being together appear to be a Trust Arrangement under UN Resolution 1541 (XV) Principle IX.

KOTA KINABALU: Inspector General of Police Khalid Abu Bakar’s threat to bring “treason” charges against Lembah Pantai MP Nurul Izzah Anwar for appearing in a picture with Jacel Kiram of the defunct Sulu Sultanate is easier said than done, said a human rights activist in Sabah. He cautioned against stirring a hornet’s nest on Malaysia in Borneo. “The Lahad Datu intruders from Sulu, for one, claimed that they were promised land, by the authorities, in eastern Sabah. That’s already ‘treason’, from the Borneo perspective.”

“Besides, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) at the Hague did not allow Manila to be a party to its hearings on Sipadan (and Ligitan), thereby refusing to consider the so-called Sabah claim.”

Daniel John Jambun, who heads the UK-based Borneo’s Plight in Malaysia Foundation (Bopim), assumes that what Khalid probably means is that he will recommend, and that the Attorney General will bring, treason charges against Nurul.

In any case, added Daniel, perhaps AG Mohd Apandi Ali should first get a point of law ruling from the Federal Court, sitting as the Constitutional Court, on what the framers of the Federal Constitution meant by treason (and sedition) and whether they apply to Sabah and Sarawak. “Article 160 of the Federal Constitution defines Federation as the Malayan Federation.”

“Sabah and Sarawak never entered the Malayan Federation. They are not signatories to the Federation of Malaya Agreement 1948 and therefore do not come under the Federation of Malaya Independence Act of 1957.”

If Article 160 means that the Malayan Federation is the basis of the greater Malaysian Federation, argues Daniel, the question that arises is whether this greater Federation still remains the Malayan Federation with Sabah and Sarawak “incorporated” therein, knowingly or unknowingly, or whether the greater Federation is a Federation of Malaya (now known as Malaysia), Sabah (North Borneo) and Sarawak. “We can leave Singapore out of the equation since it actually merged with Malaya in 1963, Sabah and Sarawak facilitating the process, and besides it has since exited the merger.”

The point of law ruling is important, stressed Daniel, since the Malayan Government has been in non compliance on the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63), and related constitutional documents, the basis for Sabah and Sarawak to be in Federation with the peninsula (with or without Singapore).

Seeking the point of law ruling, continued Daniel, can also help decide whether treason charges can be brought based on the contents of the Royal Commission Inquiry (RCI) Report on the illegal immigrant phenomenon in Sabah and Jamalul Kiram turning up at the Umno General Assembly in 2012. “The jury is still out on whether Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak shaking hands recently with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu can be included as well in all the potential treason charges the AG has to consider.”

Indeed, in proceeding further he said, the 1MDB scandal and the RM2.6 billion political “donation” controversy can also be settled in Court through treason charges.

Daniel expressed confidence that the Constitutional Court would not be able to interpret the Federal Constitution as including Sabah and Sarawak within its ambit for treason or sedition. “The Court should not stop there, and in giving written grounds for its ruling, must touch on the constitutional issue of Malaya (now Malaysia) being in Borneo.”

If the Court finds that Sabah and Sarawak are members of the Malayan Federation (now Malaysian Federation), then Sabah and Sarawak would come within the ambit of the Federal Constitution on treason (and sedition), conceded Daniel.

Again, that would raise two constitutional issues.

Firstly, the Malayan/Malaysian Government’s non-compliance on MA63 and the related constitutional documents on Sabah and Sarawak being in Federation with the peninsula (with or without Singapore).

Secondly, said Daniel, it would raise the constitutional issue of the Intention of the Founding Fathers in Borneo on the 1963 Arrangements with Malaya, Singapore and the United Kingdom with or without the UN Secretary-General.

The bottomline, urged Daniel, is to exercise caution in Borneo, indeed not open Pandora’s Box, but instead put the past behind and proceed with Sarawak Chief Minister Adenan Satem’s push for Sabah and Sarawak to regain their full autonomy. “That’s the status that Sabah and Sarawak had in 1963 and in line with MA63.”

“The idea of Sabah, Sarawak and Malaya being together, with or without Federation, may not have been envisaged to be a permanent arrangement. It appears to be a Trust Arrangement under UN Resolution 1541 (XV) Principle IX.”

Source: Free Malaysia Today

Read More

Catalan lawmakers approve plan for secession from Spain

BARCELONA, Spain (AP) — The regional parliament of Catalonia launched a plan Monday to set up a road map for independence from Spain by 2017, defying warnings from the central government in Madrid that it is violating the nation's constitution.

Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy pledged to halt the effort.

The chamber, based in the northeastern city of Barcelona, passed the secession resolution in a 72-63 vote.

The proposal was made by pro-secession lawmakers from the "Together for Yes" alliance and the extreme left-wing Popular Unity Candidacy (CUP). The groups together obtained a parliamentary majority in regional elections in September that they presented as a stand-in plebiscite on independence after the central government in Madrid refused to allow an official referendum.

Spain's government reacted swiftly Monday. In a nationally televised address, Rajoy said his government will appeal the decision at the Constitutional Court, which has in the past blocked moves toward independence.

"Catalonia is not going anywhere. Nothing is going to break," Rajoy said.

He added he would meet with the leader of the main opposition Socialist Party, Pedro Sanchez, to forge a common front against the separatists.

The resolution passed by the Catalan parliament in its first postelection session declared "the start of a process toward the creation of an independent Catalan state in the form of a republic" and a "process of democratic disconnection not subject to the decisions by the institutions of the Spanish state."

While separatist lawmakers celebrated the result in the chamber, opponents held up Spanish and Catalan flags.

"There is a growing cry for Catalonia to not merely be a country, but to be a state, with everything that means," said Raul Romeva, head of the "Together for Yes" alliance.

Catalan branches of Spain's ruling conservative Popular Party and the Socialist and the Citizens opposition parties had filed appeals to halt the vote, but Spain's Constitutional Court ruled last Thursday that it could proceed.

"You want to divide a country by raising a frontier within the European Union," Citizens regional leader Ines Arrimadas told separatist lawmakers.

The Constitutional Court is expected to quickly rule that the law is illegal, but the resolution specifically orders the regional government not to heed the decision of Spain's highest court. It gives the incoming government 30 days to start working on a new Catalan constitution, which would later be voted on in a referendum by the summer of 2017, and begin establishing a new tax office and social security administration.

Pro-secessionist parties won their majority in September on the strength of just 48 percent of the vote. Anti-independence lawmakers say that denies separatists a legitimate democratic mandate to break away from Spain.

As well as warnings from the EU that an independent Catalonia would have to ask to be admitted to the bloc, separatist forces also face an internal dispute that could slow or even derail the independence push.

Later Monday, the parliament began what is expected to be a long, heated debate over whether Artur Mas should continue for a third term as regional president.

While his "Together for Yes" alliance backs him with 62 votes, it is short of the required majority of 68. The anti-independence parties are against him, and the CUP has said it won't support Mas because of his conservative austerity policies and the corruption investigations involving his Convergence Party.

The parliament has until Jan. 9 to form a government or a new election must be called.

By then, Spain will have held a national election — on Dec. 20 — and the issue of how to handle the situation in Catalonia will play a crucial role in whether the Popular Party can hold onto power.

Polls consistently show that while the majority of the 7.5 million Catalans support holding an official referendum on independence like Scotland, they are evenly divided over whether to break centuries-old ties with the rest of Spain.

Separatists have held massive pro-independence rallies since the Constitutional Court struck down key parts of a law that would have given more power to the wealthy and industrialized region in 2010.

The ranks of lifelong secessionists, who feel that the Catalan language — spoken along with Spanish in the region — and local traditions can only flourish in an independent state, have been joined by those suffering through Spain's economic problems and who believe that Catalans pay more than their fair share in taxes.

"The Spanish state has consistently frustrated our aspirations. That's why we are where we are," Mas said. "Catalonia is a country on the move. No lawsuit, threat or fear can stop the desire of millions of people."

Analysts say that with the regional and central governments on a collision course, they will eventually be forced to negotiate a way out of the impasse.

"The social and political pressure from Catalonia will provoke a political response in Madrid," said Jordi Matas, professor of political science at the University of Barcelona

Source: KLS.com

Read More

Sarawak makes English official language along with BM

KUCHING, Nov 18 ― Sarawak has adopted English as the official language of the state administration, apart from Bahasa Malaysia, Chief Minister Tan Sri Adenan Satem said today.

Adenan told the state civil service gathering this morning that official government correspondence can be in both languages, adding that it was a practical and logical step.

“There is no need for any official correspondence between government departments to be in Bahasa Malaysia all the time, you can use English in your correspondence at the same time,” he said in his speech at the Borneo Convention Centre Kuching (BCCK) here.

“I have been labelled as not being nationalistic or patriotic enough by others when I advocate for the use of English in Sarawak. I am just being practical and logical,” he said.

The chief minister said the use of English is necessary and unavoidable, also pointing out that it is the language of science.

He cited recent reports claiming that graduates here have been finding it hard to get employment because of their poor command of English and said this proves his point on the need to be proficient in the language.

“I do not know who made the decision not to use English in the past, but it has adversely affected other people now,” he said.

Adenan then urged the state’s civil servants to be skillful in English, reminding them that it is a universal language used as a communication tool across the globe.

On a separate matter, the chief minister issued a reminder to federal officers from other states to serve Sarawak well when they are posted here.

“You are in Sarawak to serve the people here. If you don't, we will file complaints with your big bosses in Kuala Lumpur, and we have every right to complain,” he said.

He said he will ask federal lawmakers from Sarawak to complain to Parliament if federal departmental heads here do not adequately serve the state.

“The complaints will then become political issues,” he said.

Federal officers not happy with serving in Sarawak can always request for transfers, he added.

“We have no problem with that, but we must insist that you must serve the state well,” he said.

Source: The Malay Online

Read More

Be brave like ISIL fighters, Najib tells Umno

KUALA LUMPUR, June 24 — Umno must emulate the bravery of a Middle Eastern militant group that defeated an Iraqi force outnumbering it nearly 30 to one if the Malay nationalist party is to survive, Datuk Seri Najib Razak said yesterday.

The Umno president and prime minister was listing virtues that were needed to allow the Malay nationalist party to continue in power, during a dinner to commemorate the 20th anniversary of its Cheras branch yesterday.

“For example, when someone dares to fight to their death, they can even defeat a much bigger team.

“As proof — whether we agree or not is another matter — the group ISIL with the strength of just 1,300 people, can defeat an Iraqi army of 30,000 soldiers, until four, five generals with three, four stars run for their lives, jump out the window at night. Why? Because they are afraid of those who are brave,” he told more than 1,000 Umno members in attendance.

He also stressed the importance of being loyal to god, the party, and friends.

Najib said having wisdom and foresight in battles as well as the ability to organise is also crucial in strengthening the party.

The Islamic State of Iraq in the Levant (ISIL) is a splinter group of al-Qaeda that wants to set up an Islamic caliphate encompassing both Iraq and Syria.

ISIL is viewed as a terror organisation by authorities both here and abroad.

A Malaysian suspected of being a member of ISIL was believed to have been the suicide bomber who killed 25 members of an Iraqi police team last month.

Earlier this month, three local men were arrested by police for suspected links to ISIL.

Source: The Malay Online

Read More

Autonomi dituntut, subjek sejarah harus dirombak, kata Adenan Satem

Berikut ialah jawapan Ketua Menteri Sarawak dalam sesi soal jawab TV3 semalam berkaitan pembangunan serta hala tuju Negeri Sarawak.

1. Autonomi Untuk Sarawak - dahulu semasa perjanjian Malaysia 1963, kita telah mensyaratkan beberapa perkara untuk survival bangsa Sarawak di dalam Gagasan Malaysia. Sekarang kami mahunya kembali kerana kami boleh menguruskannya sendiri. Autonomi yang dituntut bukannya autonomi yang diminta-minta secara begitu sahaja SEBALIKNYA ianya sudahpun tertulis di dalam perjanjian Malaysia. Bukan bermakna meminta autonomi kita hendak KELUAR MALAYSIA tetapi kita hanya menuntut apa yang telah dimeterai dahulu. Jadi tiada isu hendak keluar Malaysia dan tiada yang perlu ditakuti oleh Kerajaan Persekutan kerana sejarah membuktikan keberadaan Sarawak membentuk Gagasan Malaysia adalah untuk bersama-sama mempertahankan diri daripada ancaman komunis dan sebagainya. Kami bukan orang yang tidak tahu sejarah itu semua. Autonomi Pendidikan: Dasar Pendidikan sekarang adalah satu dasar flip-flop polisi yang dikeluarkan oleh Menteri Pendidikan telah menghancurkan dasar pendidikan yang sepatutnya boleh melahirkan bijak pandai generasi muda dari Sarawak. Malah penempatan guru-guru juga menjadi satu yang mustahak kerana hanya orang Sarawak yang lebih mengenal apa itu adat budaya orang Sarawak.
2. Toleransi Kaum - In order you want to be tolerate, you need to respect each other. Di Sarawak, kaum bumiputera bukan hanya beragama Islam malah juga beragama lain misalnya Kristian dan Pagan. Kami ada lebih 30 etnik dengan beratus-ratus bahasa dan dialek seperti juga kepercayaan. Jika tiada dasar keterbukaan yang tidak diamalkan malah akan hancur satu negara. Kami tidak mahu seperti di Malaya yang seperti ada master in races.. we in Sarawak all adalah satu bangsa.. Sarawak cukup luas untuk semua. Dan menghormati agama lain juga adalah satu yang menjadi pengukuhan kepada satu bangsa.
3. Bahasa Inggeris - Mengapa kita harus ketepikan bahasa Inggeris jika kita tahu ianya bahasa dunia. Bukan bermakna kita belajar bahasa Inggeris kita akan mengenepikan bahasa Malaysia. Orang Sarawak misalnya lebih fasih berbahasa Inggeris berbanding dengan orang di Semenanjung kerana sejak dahulu lagi kami sentiasa memastikan ianya digunapakai kerana kami mahu bangsa Sarawak satu bangsa yang global.
4. Sejarah - Apa yang dibelajar sekarang memihak kepada sejarah Melayu sahaja yang mana ianya tidak adil sama sekali kepada bangsa Sarawak. Kami juga mempunyai sejarah sendiri yang harus anak bangsa kami mengetahuinya. Subjek sejarah sekarang HARUS DIROMBAK SAMA SEKALI.
5. Royalti - kami mahu royalti lebih daripada apa yang kami ada kerana sejajar dengan waktu ianya langsung tidak mencukupi. Tuntutan sekarang 10% dan kalau boleh 20% itu penting untuk membangunkan Sarawak lagipun ianya kepunyaan kami.
6. Kuasa jabatan - Mengapa harus ada pengagihan kuasa yang bertimpa-timpa. Jika JKR Sarawak boleh membuatnya kenapa harus ada campurtangan dari JKR Persekutuan. Kadang-kadang kontrak yang kita orang Sarawak tidak mengetahuinya kerana adanya campurtangan daripada orang yang bukan orang Sarawak.
7. Isu 1MDB, we Sarawakian don't care about it kerana kami lebih mementingkan bagaimana untuk hidup dengan keadaan ekonomi sekarang. So tidak payahlah mempengaruhi pemikiran yang tidak ada kene mengena dengan kita.
8. Pembalakan Haram - Pencuri tok ingat macam neneknya pun hutan..oohaa.. perlu dihentikan. Kita kehilangan banyak daripada pencuri-pencuri balak ini. Ianya akan diteruskan sehingga tiada lagi pembalak haram termasuk sawmill yang bersekongkol.

Share dari FB: Haslina Bujang

Read More

Tegas !!! Mendagri tandaskan, "Indonesia bukan Negara agama, ini Negara Pancasila, titik!!!"

BENDERAnews, 10/11/15 (JAKARTA) - Sudah sangat jelas dan tegas, Indonesia bukanlah Negara agama. Tetapi Indonesia adalah Negara yang berdasarkan Pancasila dan UUD 1945. Negara yang menghargai pluralitas termasuk dalam bidang agama.

Menteri Dalam Negeri (Mendagri), Tjahjo Kumolo menegaskan itu pada acara pelantikan Pengurus Pusat Pemuda Katolik, di Aula Universitas Atma Jaya, Jakarta, Minggu (8/11/15) kemarin.

“Indonesia adalah negara berdasarkan Pancasila dan UUD 1945, titik. Indonesia bukan Negara agama. Saya adalah orang yang paling tidak suka istilah mayoritas dan minoritas. Kita semua adalah warga negera Indonesia,” tandasnya lagi.

Dalam konteks tersebut, demikian Tjahjo, Negara mempunyai kewajiban untuk hadir memberikan kedamaian, rasa tenang dan kebebasan kepada seluruh rakyat Indonesia yang majemuk. Pemerintah, katanya harus memastikan dan menjamin setiap warga Negara dapat beribadah sesuai dengan agama dan keyakinannya.

“Ini harus terus-menerus dipertegas kita semua. Saya kira ini adalah prinsip-prinsip yang harus terus dikumandangkan, kalau tidak ini akan membahayakan persatuan dan kesatuan,” tegasnya.

Tjahjo pun meminta kepada semua elemen bangsa agar menjaga Indonesia sebagai Negara yang berdasarkan Pancasila dan UUD 1945 yang menghargai kemajemukan. Dengan demikian, setiap warga Negara saling menghargai, adanya kebersamaan, setiap orang dapat beribadah sesuai dengan agama dan keyakinannya. Demikian Tjahjo Kumolo, mantan Ketum DPP KNPI.

“Saya harapkan jajaran Pemuda Katolik dan seluruh pemuda, seluruh bangsa Indonesia harus berani menentukan sikap siapa kawan atau lawan terhadap organisasi, kelompok atau peorangan, atau siapa pun yang mencoba mengingkari bahwa Negara kita adalah Negara Pancasila, negara kita adalah negara majemuk, dan negara yang menjunjung tinggi nilai-nilai agama dan keberagamannya,” demikian Tjahjo Kumolo, mantan Ketum DPP KNPI. (bsc-jr/B --- JR Pro Jakarta/foto ilustrasi istimewa)

Source: Bendera News

Read More

Bangsa Negara Sarawak Sangat Tergila-gilakan Dengan Ideologi Parti-Parti Malaya

Kalau rakyat negara Sarawak masih mahukan pkr, dap mahupun amanah, maka jangan pula salahkan rakyat negara Sarawak yang lain kerana inginkan umno di negara Sarawak. Ini kerana kamu tidak mahu mengambil pengajaran yang berlaku di negara Sabah. Apabila ditegur, anda semua dengan bongkaknya mengatakan bahawa "ada hati mahu menasihat orang lain sedangkan diri-sendiri tidak terjaga".

Apabila rakyat negara Sabah memberikan nasihat tentang mengapa bangsa negara Sarawak perlu menolak pengaruh-pengaruh parti malaya di negara Sarawak adalah kerana mereka tidak mahu nasib malang itu menimpa bangsa negara Sarawak.

Kini, negara Sabah berada didalam momentum untuk menyingkirkan pengaruh malaya tetapi bangsa negara Sarawak bermati-matian mahu membawa dan menyebarkan fahaman dan ideologi malaya.

Jikalau itu sudah memang kehendak dan impian bangsa negara Sarawak untuk merasa diri dijajah secara langsung oleh kuasa politik daripada malaya, maka niat, keinginan serta impian itu dihormati.

Apa yang penting, bangsa negara Sabah sudah tekad untuk menyingkirkan ideologi perosak bangsa ini kerana sudah memahami sepenuhnya bahawa kedatangan mereka bukan untuk kepentingan bangsa negara Sabah tetapi untuk kepentingan kelangsungan parti mereka semata-mata.

Disaat bangsa negara Sabah mahu keluar daripada sangkar penjajahan halus ini, disaat itu pula bangsa negara Sarawak berusaha untuk masuk sangkar.

Ini adalah realiti yang sedang berlaku sekarang yang tidak mampu dilihat dengan jelas oleh kebanyakan bangsa negara Sarawak yang pro ideologi malaya.

Source: The Future Sabah/Sarawak and the Federation of Malaysia

Read More

Sistem "Divide and Rule" di Sabah

Sistem "divide and rule" (pecah dan perintah) yang dilakukan oleh pihak British terhadap Persekutuan Tanah Melayu di mana Tanah Melayu dipecahkan kepada TIGA SISTEM pemerintahan yang berasingan, iaitu Negeri-negeri Selat, Negeri-negeri Melayu Bersekutu dan Negeri-negeri Melayu Tidak Bersekutu. Selain itu, masyarakat Melayu, Cina dan India diasingkan atau dipecah-belahkan mengikut sistem politik, sektor pekerjaan dan penempatan. Dengan sistem ini, amat sukar dan mustahil masyarakat berbilang kaum di Tanah Melayu pada masa itu boleh bersatu padu. Kaum-kaum tertentu terikat dengan parti-parti khusus yang mewakili mereka. UMNO dan PAS hanya untuk parti orang Melayu, MCA & GERAKAN khusus untuk orang Cina dan MIC untuk masyarakat India. Versi baru, lahirlah PKR, DAP dan AMANAH.

Sistem dan konsep British ini diwujudkan di Sabah era Tun Mahathir, di mana pemimpin-pemimpin serpihan PBS dipecahkan melalui penajaan beberapa parti seperti Parti AKAR (Mark Koding), SAPP (Yong Teck Lee), PDS/UPKO (Bernard Dompok), PBRS (Joseph Kurup) , LDP (Chong Kah Kiat). Impak daripada kewujudan parti yang banyak ini telah jelas memecah-belahkan rakyat Sabah untuk mengikuti parti-parti tertentu 'mengikut citarasa', bukan mengikut kepada komuniti seperti konsep awal di dalam Perikatan Sabah. Kebanyakkan rakyat akan lari ke sana dan lari ke sini untuk mendapatkan peluang dan habuan tertentu yang ditawarkan oleh parti-parti yang ada. Sistem 'Pecahkan dan Perintah' berjaya diimplimintasikan terhadap rakyat Sabah dan sehingga kini UMNO-BN bernafas lega menikmati segala sumber kekayaan dan keistimewaan yang terdapat di Sabah yang sepatutnya milik rakyat Sabah.

Demikian juga pada era ini, di mana selepas PRU-13 dicatatkan oleh laman web FreeMalaysiaToday (FMT) yang bertarikh 25 Mac 2014, bahawa Jabatan Pendaftaran Pertubuhan Malaysia (JPPM) telah meluluskan secara rasmi 13 parti politik baru bagi Sabah. Jika dicampurkan dengan parti politik sedia ada seperti SAPP, PBRS, LDP, PBS, UPKO, STAR dan parti penjajah UMNO, DAP & PKR, ianya menjadikan 23 buah Parti Politik Di Sabah sebagai medium memecah-belahkan rakyat Sabah. Lihat Senarai lengkap ini dan fikirkanlah hasil kecekapan otak pemimpin Malaya lakukan kepada Sabah:-

01. Parti PBS

02. Parti SAPP

03. Parti PBRS

04. Parti LDP

05. Parti UPKO

06. Parti STAR

07. Parti UMNO

08. Parti DAP

09. Parti PAS

10. Parti PKR

11. Parti Bersatu Bugis Sabah (PBBS)

12. Parti Cinta Sabah (PCS)

13. Parti Damai Sabah (Parti SPP)

14. Parti Ekonomi Rakyat Sabah (PERS)

15. Parti Gagasan Bersama Rakyat Sabah (PARTI BERSAMA)

16. Parti Kebangsaan Sabah

17. Parti Kebenaran Sabah (KEBENARAN)

18. Parti Pembangunan Warisan Sabah

19. Parti Sejahtera Angkatan Perpaduan Sabah (SAPU)

20. Pertubuhan Kebangsaan Sabah Bersatu (BARU)

21. Pertubuhan Perpaduan Rakyat Kebangsaan Sabah (PERPADUAN)

22. Parti Perpaduan Rakyat Sabah (PPRS)

23. Parti Kerjasama Rakyat Sabah (PKRS)

Perkara ini sepatutnya diambil serius oleh para pemimpin politik Sabah dan rakyat, di mana melalui banyaknya parti di Sabah akan membuka ruang yang sangat lebar bagi pemimpin dan rakyat Sabah berpecah, berpuak-puak, mendominasi, mempersalahkan, syak wasangka, iri hati, saling menyalahkan, mengungkit-ungkit, parti ini mengambil orang dari parti itu untuk menjadi ahlinya dengan cara yang tidak sihat dan semua perkara yang berlaku banyak mengarah kepada hal-hal negatif. Kelihatannya ruang untuk rakyat Sabah bersatu padu ketika era USNO, BERJAYA & PBS musnah serta sangat tipis keberangkalian rakyat Sabah bersatu lagi.

Source: Nipuhawang-awis

Read More

O Canada.....What a cabinet.

O Canada.....What a cabinet:

Minister of Health is a doctor.

Minister of Transport is an astronaut.

Minister of National Defense is a Sikh Veteran.

Minister of Youth is under the age of 45.

Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food is a former farmer.

Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness was a Scout.

Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development was a financial analyst.

Minister of Finance is a successful businessman.

Minister of Justice was a crown prosecutor and is a First Nations leader.

Minister of Sport, and Persons with Disabilities is a visually impaired Paralympian.

Minister of Fisheries and Oceans, and Canadian Coastguard is Inuit.

Minister of Science is a medical geographer with a PhD.

New titles include

Minister of Immigration, Citizenship and Refugees was an Immigration critic.

There are scientists in the cabinet, and it is made up of 50% women.

Source: Thought-Pensees

Read More

Catalonia takes historic first step to independence from Spain

BARCELONA, Spain – Spain’s autonomous Catalonia region on Monday passed a historic resolution supporting independence, with the separatist alliance that tabled the motion saying this could happen within 18 months.

The resolution calls for separation from Spain by 2017.

The controversial bill was approved with 72 votes against 63, a year after the Catalan government held an informal referendum on independence, which Madrid declared illegal.

MPs from the coalition Junts pel Si (Together for Yes), which includes acting prime minister Artur Mas’ center-rightist CIU party and the small leftist CUP, threw their votes behind the resolution. 

Both parties together hold the majority in the chamber since local elections in September.

Monday’s historic resolution ended with ceremonies in which regional representatives from both sides waved Catalan and Spanish flags inside the chamber.

The resolution says the parliament is not beholden to decisions by the Spanish central government – the first time in Spanish history that this has happened. 

The motion gives Catalan lawmakers 30 days to start working on a new Catalan constitution that will be put to a vote in a later referendum, and on legislation to create a new tax and social security administration. 

The end result would be a fully independent republic.

Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy warned in a televised speech that his government would appeal the decision at the Constitutional Court.

“The government will not allow this to continue,” he declared.

“Catalonia is not going to disconnect from anywhere, and there is going to be no break-up,” he said.

Catalonia, a region of 7.5 million people in Spain’s northeast, has its own distinctive culture and language. 

A long-running separatist movement in Catalonia has been fueled by politicians who protest that the rich, industrialized region is contributing too much to the national budget in order to subsidize the country’s poorer provinces. 

Source: Rudaw.net

Read More

Catalonia approves plans for secession from Spain

Catalonia’s regional parliament has approved a plan to set up a road map for independence from Spain by 2017, in defiance of repeated calls by the central government in Madrid, which has branded the secessionist campaign as totally illegal.

Lawmakers on Monday passed the motion by 72 to 63 votes. The proposal was initially handed in by pro-independence MPs from the Together for Yes alliance and the extreme left-wing Popular Unity Candidacy.

The two parties submitted the proposal to the parliament after gaining a majority in September's regional elections.

This was the first session of the legislature, which is based in the northeastern city of Barcelona, since the September election. Following the Monday vote, pro-secession lawmakers lauded the approval of the motion as a great victory.

There is a growing cry for Catalonia to not merely be a country, but to be a state with everything that means,” said Raul Romeva, the head of the parliamentary majority behind the motion.

Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy had threatened to take legal action if Catalan lawmakers opt for independence.

The government in Madrid has pledged to ask the Constitutional Court to declare the resolution void if it is passed. The Court had on Thursday ruled that the vote could go ahead. Spanish media said, however, that the body would quickly rule the plan illegal, although lawmakers have reportedly inserted a measure into the law which allows the regional government to ignore such a ruling.

The road map also gives a 30-day ultimatum to the incoming government to start drafting a new Catalan constitution, which would later be voted on in a referendum. The regional government would then begin establishing a new tax office and social security administration.

The pro-secessionists face not only internal pressure, which could seriously derail or slow down their bid to break away from Spain, but also a call from the European union which has said that an independent Catalonia will have to apply separately to join the 28-nation bloc.

Catalonia is home to 7.5 million people and accounts for a fifth of Spain’s economic output. Many Catalans have accused the government of siphoning off their tax money, saying the regional state will be more prosperous in economic terms if it gains secession.

A symbolic referendum on independence was held in 2014 with more than 80 percent voting in favor in what Madrid described as an unconstitutional move. 

Source: PRESSTV.COM

Read More

Negara Sabah Pasti Akan Merdeka Bila Sampai Masanya!

Saya sempat bercerita dengan pegawai imigresen Singapura.

Dia cakap, Johor dalam proses mau keluar Malaysia, dan Saya cakap Sabah juga sama.

Saya kata pada dia, sekali Sabah Merdeka tetap Merdeka.

Dia cakap, "Johor Such a big Country", terus saya balas, Sabah far more bigger country than Johor. Dia terus bilang "You are very Proud about Sabah ya", Of Course Saya bilang.

Last dia tanya, Do you think Sabah better without Malaysia?

Then saya jawab, we will become one of the richest country once we are "out" from Malaysia.

Paling last dia jawab, Your Time Will Come, like Us...Dont Worry!! ^^ Amen.

DSCC

Singapura

Source: DS Chazy Chaz

Read More

European Separatism: Scotland, Catalonia, and Growing Divisions in the EU

Despite the recent stability among Europe’s nation-states, the continent has for generations been incredibly divided. In addition to wars and centuries-long rivalries, the demographic composition of the states themselves has often been a source of conflict. As alliances, conquests, and marriages merged the territories of Europe’s many kingdoms over the centuries, minority groups were invariably caught in the middle, leading to internal conflicts and competing territorial claims that worsened existing conflicts among European states. Notable examples include Scotland, Catalonia, Flanders, Wallonia, Alsace-Lorraine, Northern Ireland, and the Basque Country.

Few European minorities, however, are more relevant today than  the Scots and the Catalans, as they have launched high-profile independence movements that have captured global attention and threaten to permanently alter European geopolitics. These movements have significant backing among their people, whose existing regional governments provide an organized power structure capable of supporting and sustaining independence movements. Most importantly, these movements are having a large impact on two incredibly important European states: the United Kingdom and Spain. While the governing structure of the European Union (which requires unanimous consent for new members) would likely leave an independent Scotland or Catalonia looking from the outside in, thus harming the viability of these potential states, these movements should not be ignored. The rise of Scottish and Catalan nationalism and the resulting responses by their governments contains important lessons for EU member states and will be an important political issue in the EU for years to come as both peoples pursue political independence.

On September 18, 2014, Scotland voted 55%-45% to remain in the United Kingdom, ending, at least temporarily, the efforts of the Scottish Nationalist Party (SNP) to bring about an independent Scotland. During the referendum, Britain’s three major political parties formed a coalition that encouraged Scots to vote no and remain in the U.K. Among the issues used to convince Scots to vote no was the uncertainty of an independent Scotland being able to join the EU. This argument was effective for several reasons, and it demonstrates why the existence of the EU is a major obstacle for any independence movement within the EU. First, since the process for new states to join the Union requires the unanimous consent of all existing member states, the new state’s former state (or any other hostile member state) could easily derail its membership. This gives significant power to member states with separatist movements because they can both deny an independent state within their former territory EU membership and similarly deny membership to any other new, independent state within the Union in order to discourage a separatist movement within its own borders. Second, the denial of EU membership would, in itself, likely derail most independence movements. Losing the Euro, membership in European Economic Area (EEA), and the benefits of open borders would cause any newly independent European state to experience long-term economic challenges, as easy access to other European markets through the EEA’s free trade zone, open borders with other EU member states, and membership in the EU’s strong currency would be cut off upon gaining independence. While some of these challenges would not be applicable to Scotland or would apply in different ways, the prospect of these difficulties was a potent weapon deployed by the No-vote coalition in Scotland. As a result, it also strengthened the appeal of another common obstacle for independence movements: the promise of more regional powers by the central government.

A popular solution for dealing with separatist movements in recent times has been giving regions with a desire to seek independence more devolved powers over regional affairs. This can range from empowering the regional governor to creating an entirely separate regional parliament and government, as Britain has done in Scotland and as Spain has done in Catalonia. National governments also have a wide range of additional devolutionary tools at their disposal to give more powers to existing regional governments in order to create greater self-rule, including more spending and taxing powers and greater local say over how national laws apply to the region. This strategy is effective because it maintains national unity while satisfying the grievances of increasingly separatist regions that want more local control over their own affairs.

Separatists can use the prospect of independence as an excellent bargaining chip to seek greater regional autonomy. For instance, the Scottish referendum forced Westminster to offer Scotland more devolved powers, and, despite the referendum’s failure, the Scottish people strengthened their regional government by electing 56 members of the SNP to the British Parliament at the polls this past May. As a result, all but 3 MPs from Scotland are members of the SNP. If Parliament follows through on its promises, a strengthened Scottish regional government will satisfy many Scots who might otherwise have considered supporting independence. The appeal of gaining more regional powers is a potent obstacle for independence movements because many grievances can be remedied without independence. This, coupled with the prospect of being left out of the EU, makes independence an extremely hard sell. However, if central governments are unwilling to consider expanding regional powers and address the concerns of minority groups, they fuel separatist movements because independence (and the threat of it) becomes the only way to address regional concerns.

Despite important differences between the two regions, these lessons from Scotland are equally applicable to Catalonia’s quest to be independent from Spain. While Catalonia has a much larger share of its nation’s population than does Scotland and has an even more disproportionate amount of its nation’s economic activity, it would still face many of the same issues that have deterred Scottish independence. Though Catalonia could be categorized as Spain’s economic powerhouse, a departure from Spain and the EU could have dramatic economic consequences, making it difficult to trade with its former countrymen and France to the north and forcing many multinational corporations doing business in Barcelona to relocate in order to remain in the EU. This, combined with the loss of the Euro and membership in the open-border Schengen Area, would make independence a hard sell to Catalans, particularly if Spain decides to offer Catalonia more regional powers.

But Catalonia is also a perfect example of how central governments should not handle independence movements. Spain, in an effort to deny legitimacy to Catalan calls for independence, has ignored referendum attempts and refused to offer more regional powers beyond the current constitutional arrangement. By stifling overwhelming calls for a referendum and failing to offer Catalans an alternative to independence, the Spanish Government is only fueling the rise of Catalonian separatism and deepening the distrust between Catalans and the Spanish Government stemming from decades of difficulties during the Franco regime. When independence movements like those in Catalonia and Scotland are supported by legitimate historical claims, cultural identity, and growing popular support, national governments should take them seriously and have confidence that the desire for national unity will trump separatist aspirations in a popular vote.  Failing to do so is undemocratic and will only strengthen the legitimacy of calls for independence. As Scotland’s referendum showed, putting the question to a vote can have positive results for national unity; the national government earned a democratic mandate to keep Scotland in the U.K.

Another interesting European example of separatism is the situation of Flanders and Wallonia in Belgium. The Dutch-speaking Flemish and French-speaking Walloons both have sought independence at various times in Belgium’s history since its independence from the Netherlands in 1830. However, as Flanders has grown in population and prospered economically, Flemish calls for independence have increased in recent years despite Flanders and Wallonia already having their own regional governments in Belgium’s federal system. Flanders now contains over 60% of Belgium’s population and three-quarters of its economic activity, meaning that Flanders effectively subsidizes the less-wealthy Wallonia region in terms of government programs. And as a result of mounting Flemish frustration, the pro-separatist New Flemish Alliance won a plurality in Belgium’s parliament in the 2014 elections. The existence of two incredibly distinct peoples in two different regions of the country makes Belgium’s situation very complex, since independence for Flanders would effectively mean the end of the Belgian state. The Belgian government thus faces an immense dilemma; it can neither allow an independence referendum, as a ‘yes’ vote would tear apart the Belgian nation, nor can it afford to ignore the New Flemish Alliance and its supporters.

Despite the difficulties that the EU creates for independence movements, they should not be ignored or written off. Scotland was less than half a million votes from leaving the United Kingdom after three centuries of unity with England, and the Tory government in London is now confronted with the problem of how to deal with the issues surrounding Scottish calls for more autonomy. How it does so will determine whether support for Scottish independence wanes or continues to grow. With the possible exception of Belgium, European nations dealing with independence movements should heed the lessons of Scotland, for the democratic principles that form the foundation of modern liberal democracies and the EU demand that the legitimate grievances of separatist citizens receive due consideration. As the past year has shown in Ukraine, separatism can be incredibly dangerous to the stability of nations and even lead to war in extreme circumstances when it is ignored or left unchecked. While devolution of powers to regional governments and independence referendums are often controversial and may have unintended consequences not discussed here, they often offer the best chance for keeping a state together despite the centrifugal forces pulling it apart from the inside.

Connor Pfeiffer is a sophomore from San Antonio, Texas, tentatively majoring in the History Department. He can be reached at connorp@princeton.edu.

Source: The Prince Tontory

Read More

DONALD STEPHENS' CRITICISMS OF "MALAYSIA PLAN"

HISTORIC VIEWS

STRAITS TIMES REPORT 1961

On 18 July 1961 a letter from former Sabah C.M. Donald Stephens was published in the Straits times criticizing Malaya's attempts to push their Malaysia Plan on the Borneo countries of Brunei, North Borneo (Sabah) and Sarawak.

His polite but firm comments inferred that Malaya was pushing its Malaysia Plan on the Borneo countries and smacked of "colonialism".

He made the followings points which are even more accurate and self evident after over 50 years for Sabah and Sarawak as vassal states. Brunei is the only country to gain real independence.

1. Borneo people opposed Malaysia.
2. Borneo countries should have independence first and consider "Malaysia" later.
3. Borneo countries are to deal with Malaya on equal basis and not as vassals.
4. "We do not want to join Malaya as colonies" (Britain colluded with Malaya to transfer Borneo sovereignty without independence)
5. "Borneonize" civil service first and not have new "expatriates" come and take the top jobs.
6. Malaysia Plan was against the Borneo nationalist aspirations for independence.
7. Malaya should instead "urge" Brunei to help form a federation of the 3 Borneo territories first.
8. The alternative idea of a confederation with Malaya could be considered after formation of the "Borneo Federation".
9. He expressed concern about Malayan interference in the independence process with their plan to make Borneo states dependent on Malaya.
10. He asked Malaya to stop interfering and forget about making Brunei North Borneo and Sarawak the 12th, 13th and 14th States of Malaya..

Source: Borneo Wiki

Read More

Garis Masa Kedudukan Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak Dahulu dan Kini...

Melihat kepada Garis Masa (Timeline) ini, mungkin anda dapat melihat secara umum tentang status sebenar negara Sabah dan negara Sarawak. 

Pihak SSKM-SSU(UK) mengambil tahun 1946 sebagai permulaan kepada Garis Masa ini sebagai pendedahan sejarah tentang status kedudukan Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak adalah bertujuan untuk membuatkan anda semua faham. Ini juga kerana pada tahun tersebut jugalah negara Malaya wujud sebagai "Malayan Union" yang berstatus "Jajahan Makhota British ataupun Crown Colony of British" yang hanya mampu bertahan sehingga tahun 1948 sahaja sebelum ditukar status kepada "Tanah Naungan British ataupun Protectorate State of British".

Sebelum ini, semasa gambar Garis Masa ini dikongsikan, pihak kami mendapati seperti kurang perhatian diberikan. Apakah ia bermaksud bahawa rakyat negara Sabah dan rakyat negara Sarawak tidak mampu untuk memahami maksud didalam gambar ini? Jikalau itu yang menjadi penyebabnya, maka pihak kami akan berikan penerangan secara ringkas yang mudah difahami oleh anda semua.

TAHUN 1946-1948

JAJAHAN MAKHOTA BRITISH

Selepas Perang Dunia Kedua (WWII) berakhir pada tahun 1945, negara-negara yang berada dibawah pentadbiran British diletakkan dibawah Pentadbiran Ketenteraan British (British Military Administration - BMA) sementara untuk menunggu ketibaan pemerintahaan rasmi daripada British. Ia termasuklah Malaya (11 negeri), Negara Singapura, Negara North Borneo (kini dikenali sebagai negara Sabah) dan Negara Sarawak. Setelah beberapa bulan dibawah pentadbiran BMA, maka pentadbiran tersebut diserahkan kepada Kerajaan British. Penyerahan pentadbiran tersebut telah menyaksikan bahawa Negara North Borneo dan Negara Sarawak yang dahulunya berstatus "Naungan British ataupun Protectorate State of British" dibawah Pentadbiran British Borneo Chartered Company telah ditukarkan menjadi "Tanah Jajahan Makhota British ataupun Crown Colony of British".

11 buah negeri-negeri Tanah Melayu telah dipersekutukan menjadi satu Kesatuan yang dikenali sebagai Kesatuan Malaya ataupun Malayan Union. Seperti yang diperkatakan sebentar tadi, Malayan Union juga telah diberikan status Tanah Jajahan Makhota British ataupun Crown Colony of British. Namun, pada tahun 1948, setelah penentangan berlaku tanpa henti, akhirnya Malayan Union telah dibubarkan dan diganti dengan Persekutuan Tanah Melayu (Federation of Malaya) dengan status dinaiktarafkan menjadi Tanah Naungan British ataupun Protectorate State of British. Dengan status ini juga, negara Persekutuan Tanah Melayu (Malaya) telah melalui proses Berkerajaan Sendiri (Self-Government) sehingga pada tahun 1957 sebelum mencapai kemerdekaan pada 31 Ogos 1957.

Manakala Negara North Borneo dan Negara Sarawak masih kekal dengan status Tanah Jajahan Makhota British yang ditadbir terus daripada Pejabat Tanah Jajahan di London. Semua kata putus adalah daripada British. Rakyat Negara North Borneo dan rakyat Negara Sarawak tidak mempunyai suara, perwakilan dalam kerajaan ataupun hak dalam menentukan masa depan negara mereka. Itulah keburukan yang dimiliki oleh mana-mana kerajaan yang berstatus "Tanah Jajahan Makhota".

Berbeza pula dengan negara Brunei, statusnya kekal sebagai "Tanah Naungan British ataupun Protectorate State of British" yang masih mempunyai kerajaan dan mempunyai hak untuk bersuara. 

Negara Burma pada waktu itu juga berada dibawah jajahan British dan belum mencapai kemerdekaannya. Burma mencapai kemerdekaannya pada tahun 1947 sekali bersama dengan Negara Sri Lanka yang pada waktu itu dikenali sebagai (Ceylon).

Indonesia dan Philippine pula pada tahun itu sudah mencapai Kemerdekaannya manakalah Thailand satu-satunya negara di Asia Tenggara yang tidak pernah dijajah oleh mana-mana negara Barat kerana kepintaran Raja mereka.

TAHUN 1957-1963

Pada Tahun 1957, Persekutuan Tanah Melayu (Malaya) telah mencapai kemerdekaannya daripada British. Pada ketika itu, Negara North Borneo, Negara Sarawak dan Negara Singapura masih berada dibawah Jajahan Makhota British. Namun pada tahun 1959, Negara Singapura sudah mencapai status Berkerajaan Sendiri Sepenuhnya (Full Internal Self-Government). 

Namun, pada tahun 1963, atas dasar tipu muslihat yang didalangi oleh Malaya yang berusaha mempengaruhi keputusan British telah menyebabkan Negara North Borneo, Negara Sarawak dan Negara Singapura terpedaya untuk "membentuk Malaysia" yang kononnya pada 16 September 1963 itu merupakan tarikh dimana sebuah "Persekutuan Baru" dibentuk. Tetapi, hakikatnya tidak pernah ada sebuah Persekutuan Baru dibentuk pada 16 September 1963 di Asia Tenggara. Apa yang baru hanyalah nama Persekutuan Tanah Melayu (Malaya) yang ditukar ganti menjadi "Malaysia". Perkara ini dapat disahkan melalui keterangan keahlian Persekutuan Tanah Melayu (Malaya) di United Nations (UN).

Pada 16 September 1963, kononnya Negara Sabah, Negara Sarawak dan Negara Singapura diberikan kemerdekaan apabila terbentuknya "Malaysia" namun perkara itu sebenarnya tidak berlaku. Ini kerana "Kuasa Kedaulatan, Kuasa Pentadbiran, Kuasa Perundangan dan Kuasa Kehakiman" tidak diserahkan kepada Kerajaan Negara Sabah, Kerajaan Negara Sarawak dan Kerajaan Negara Singapura. Kuasa-kuasa tersebut telah dipindahkan daripada Ibu Pejabat Pentadbiran Tanah Jajahan British ke Ibu Pejabat Pentadbiran Malaya di Kuala Lumpur.

Kehadiran Perwakilan Bangsa-Bangsa Bersatu (PBB) ke Negara North Borneo (Sabah) dan Negara Sarawak adalah hanya untuk meninjau secara umum tanpa sebarang penelitian khusus mahupun memungut memorandum. Kedatangan mereka adalah untuk membuat penilaian mengikut Resolusi UN 1541. Kenyataan tersebut dinyatakan oleh U Thant, yang merupakan Setiausaha Bangsa-Bangsa Bersatu (PBB) dalam kesimpulannya hasil laporan daripada tinjauan perwakilan mereka. Beliau dengan tegas menjelaskan bahawa (dalam petikan)...

"...There was no reference to a referendum or plebiscite in the request which was addressed to me. I was asked to ascertain the wishes of the people 'within the context of General Assembly resolution 1541 (xv), principle ix of the annex, by a fresh approach' which in my opinion was necessary 'to ensure complete compliance with the principle of Self-Determination within the requirements embodied in principle ix', taking into consideration certain questions relating to the recent elections. The mission accordingly arranged for consultations with the population through the elected representatives of the people, leaders of political parties and other groups and organisations, and with all person who were willing to express their views, and every effort was made to ascertain the wishes of the special groups (political detainees and absentees) mentioned in the Manila joint statement. The mission gathered and studied all available documents, reports and other material on the governmental institutions, political organisation, electoral process in the two territories, and other matters relevant to its term of reference..."

Report of UN mission to Malaysia: inward telegram OCULAR 1441 Sir P Dean to Lord Home, forwarding the text of U Thant's final conclusions.

Dalam erti kata lain, ketika membentuk "Malaysia", Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak sebenarnya masih lagi berstatus "Tanah Jajahan". Walau bagaimanapun, Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak sungguh bernasib baik kerana sebelum 16 September 1963, status Negara North Borneo (31 Ogos 1963) dan Negara Sarawak (22 Julai 1963) sudah mencapai status "Berkerajaan Sendiri (Self-Government)" dan pada 16 September 1963, ia telah mencapai Berkerajaan Sendiri Sepenuhnya (Full Internal Self-Government) setelah Jawatan Yang Dipertua Negara dan Governor dipegang oleh rakyat Negara Sabah dan rakyat Negara Sarawak.

Hujah dan kenyataan pihak SSKM-SSU(UK) ini dapat disokong melalui beberapa bukti. Antaranya ialah;

1. Akbar Lama yang merekod kenyataan Donald Stephen, Stephen Kalong Ningkan dan Lee Kuan Yew.
2. Kenyataan British
3. Kenyataan UN

Bukti-bukti ini akan dikeluarkan pada artikel seterusnya nanti.

TAHUN 1965

Namun, setelah Malaysia dibentuk pada 16 September 1963, malaya dengan bersungguh-sungguh telah memulakan rentak penindasannya untuk mengganggu pentadbiran rakan-rakannya. Ia dimulai dengan Negara Singapura. Kerajaan Malaya yang telah dikenali sebagai Kerajaan Persekutuan Malaysia selepas 16 September 1963 telah cuba untuk mencampuri urusan pentadbiran Negara Singapura dengan memaksa Kerajaan Negara Singapura untuk tunduk kepada arahan mereka. Keadaan menjadi tegang apabila Kerajaan Negara Singapura dibawah kepimpinan Perdana Menteri mereka, Lee Kuan Yew menentang campur tangan Kerajaan Malaya kerana ia boleh ditafsirkan sebagai perlanggaran kefahaman asas pembentukan Malaysia yang telah dipersetujui sebelum ini. Perkara ini berlarutan sehingga pada 7 Ogos 1965, ia telah membawa kepada perpisahan dan Tunku Abdul Rahman telah mengistiharkan secara rasmi perpisahan tersebut pada 9 Ogos 1965. 

Antara punca-punca yang membawa kepada perpisahan Negara Singapura daripada Malaysia adalah seperti berikut:

1. Disagreement over Common Market (Percanggahan Pendapat tentang Pasaran Bersama)
2. Different Treatment of Races (Perbezaan Layanan Kaum)
3. "Malaysian Malaysia Campaign" (Kempen Malaysian Malaysia)
4. Different Political Ideology (Perbezaan Ideologi Politik)
5. Political Rivalry between PAP and Alliance Party (Persaingan Politik antara PAP dan Parti Perikatan - kini dikenali sebagai Barisan Nasional).

Hanya 5 Faktor utama sahaja yang membawa kepada Perpisahan ini. Bagaimana pula dengan Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak? Pihak kami sangat yakin bahawa terdapat lebih daripada 5 faktor yang akan menjustifikasikan sebab-sebab apa yang membolehkan perpisahan Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak dilakukan. Perkara ini akan diulaskan dengan lebih panjang dan teliti pada artikel seterusnya nanti.

Setelah berpisah, Negara Singapura telah menjadi Republik Negara Singapura dan menjadi ahli anggota ASEAN dan PBB. Negara Singapura telah menjadi setaraf dengan Malaysia hasil jelmaan Malaya. Manakala Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak pula masih kekal menjadi jajahan Malaya yang bertopengkan Malaysia. Penghinaan itu dapat dirasai apabila status Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak telah menjadi 'negeri' dan setaraf dengan negeri-negeri di Malaya yang sebenarnya hanya berstatus 'Daerah' sahaja di Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak. 

Negara Singapura juga telah berjaya mengembalikan kedudukannya untuk setaraf dengan negara-negara di ASEAN dan DUNIA manakala kedudukan Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak masih sedang menanti untuk kembali ke kedudukan asal. Atas sebab itu gambar Garis Masa memperlihatkan kekosongan pada nombor 3 dan 4 bagi menyampaikan mesej bahawa Bangsa Negara Sabah dan Bangsa Negara Sarawak MESTI berusaha untuk mengembalikan maruah dan darjat bangsa Borneo ini. Kita mesti keluar daripada kepompong penjajahan yang hina, jijik dan kotor ini. Langkah awal yang perlu dilakukan ialah dengan menyingkirkan dakyah dan ideologi politik malaya! Itu adalah tugas Pertama yang perlu dilakukan. Tolak sokongan terhadap parti-parti malaya yang berleluasa di Bumi Borneo ini.

TAHUN 1984

Pada tahun 1984 pula, negara Brunei telah mencapai status Merdeka dan bebas daripada jajahan British secara rasmi. Manakala Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak masih lagi berada dibawah regim jajahan malaya sehingga kini.

Masa depan Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak kini terletak ditangan Generasi-Generasi Muda. Ini kerana kepimpinan baru bakal mengubah landskap politik Borneo dan Malaya. Sentimen untuk menyokong Parti-parti tempatan kini kian mendapat tempat dan semangat Nasionalisme dan Patriotisme semakin dapat dihayati, difahami dan diserap oleh semua rakyat Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak. Kepimpinan Malaya kini dilihat sebagai Parasit yang menumpang hasil kekayaan Borneo untuk terus hidup. Hati Bangsa Borneo kini sudah semakin keras dan kental untuk tidak lagi memberi peluang dan ruang untuk penindasan dan penjajahan ini berterusan kerana jikalau itu berlaku, masa depan generasi bangsa Borneo di Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak akan terus malap.

Pada tahun bilakah Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak akan mencapai Kemerdekaan sebenar?

Ia terpulang kepada tahap kesedaran dan keberanian rakyat negara Sabah dan rakyat negara Sarawak. Kemerdekaan ini tidak akan dapat dicapai selagi tiada PERPADUAN kerana ia adalah SYARAT ASAS untuk berjaya. Untuk mencapai Perpadauan ini, ia mestilah ditonjolkan melalui Sokongan Politik Tempatan. Ini kerana perjuangan ini sememangnya melibatkan kuasa politik. Petisyen SSKM-SSU(UK) memainkan peranan sebagai pemangkin (pencepat proses) untuk menjadikan Kemerdekaan sebagai Realiti. 

Sekarang adakah anda sudah faham? Jikalau ya, sila sebarkan artikel ini bersama sekali dengan gambar Garis Masa agar kefahaman itu jelas difahami oleh semua rakyat Bangsa Negara Sabah dan Bangsa Negara Sarawak.

Read More

"Sabah akan terus berdepan dengan ketidakstabilan politik, keselamatan, ekonomi dan sosial jikalau terus berada dalam malaysia"

Kenyataan RASMI ringkas SSKM-SSU(UK).

Sebuah artikel dalam surat khabar Utusan telah memuatkan kenyataan masidi manjun, Adun umno DUN N.30 Keranaan, Ranau. Dalam tajuk artikel tersebut, dia mengatakan bahawa "Sabah berdepan ancaman jika keluar malaysia".

Beberapa persoalan boleh dibangkitkan bagi menafikan kenyataan tersebut. Namun, mungkin elok kita meneliti apakah ancaman-ancaman yang dimaksudkannya jikalau bangsa Negara Sabah ingin menamatkan persekutuan dengan malaya dalam malaysia.

Antara ancaman yang kononnya akan timbul adalah seperti berikut:

1. Sabah akan berdepan ancaman dari aspek keselamatan serta pembangunan jika memilih untuk keluar daripada persekutuan malaysia.
2. Memberi ruang kepada Filipina untuk mengemukakan tuntutan.
3. Mungkin menjadi mangsa keadaan akibat pertembungan kuasa-kuasa besar di Laut China Selatan.
4. Keadaan politik yang berlaku dengan pembangunan pulau-pulau buatan manusia oleh China serta kehadiran kapal perang Amerika Syarikat (AS) di Laut China Selatan amat membimbangkan.
5. Jika kita mengambil keputusan itu (keluar malaysia) atas rasa tidak puas hati dan mengikut emosi, kita berdepan 'ancaman' lebih besar iaitu dikuasai oleh China atau AS.
6. Isu Pendatang Tanpa Izin.

Apabila meniliti ancaman-ancaman yang dimaksudkannya itu, satu persoalan yang perlu dijawab olehnya iaitu adakah dengan terus berada didalam persekutuan palsu ini yang bernama malaysia, semua ancaman ini akan dapat dielakkan ataupun selesai?

Mari kita bersama-sama menjawab dengan jujur akan ancaman yang dibangkitkan yang bertujuan untuk menakutkan rakyat bangsa negara Sabah melalui persoalan demi persoalan.

Pertama [1], apakah selama 52 tahun negara Sabah berada didalam persekutuan palsu ini yang sebenarnya merupakan jelmaan malaya kepada malaysia telah memberi jaminan keselamatan dan pembangunan yang sewajarnya? Jikalau ya, mengapa kadar jenayah yang mengancam keselamatan rakyat tidak pernah menemui titik noktah? Mengapa berlaku kes penculikan di Sandakan (sehingga kini belum diselamatkan), Semporna, pencerobohan di Tanduo Lahad Datu? Mengapa pedalaman masih lagi ketinggalan dalam aspek pembangunan? Ranau masih berstatus pekan (termasuk dengan kawasan pedalaman ditempat lain diseluruh negara Sabah)? Masih terlalu banyak rakyat negara Sabah yang masih belum dapat menerima kemudahan asas seperti jalan raya yang berturap, bekalan air bersih, elektrik serta perkhidmatan kesihatan yang mencukupi? 

Kedua [2], mengapa anda masih menggunakan isu bodoh seperti ini? Bukankah isu ini sudah dibawa ke Makhamah Tinggi Antarabangsa dan kes ini telah dimenangi oleh kerajaan malaysia bahawa tuntutan Filipina tidak berasas serta tidak mempunyai locus standi? Apakah anda kurang membaca, tidak mendapat info tepat atau sememangnya berbuat bodoh seperti mana pemimpin-pemimpin umno yang lain lakukan selama ini?

Ketiga, Keempat dan Kelima [3,4,5], adakah dengan terus berada didalam persekutuan palsu ini yang bernama malaysia, negara Sabah dapat mengelak ancaman kuasa-kuasa besar seperti China dan AS? Anda khuatiri negara Sabah 'mungkin' akan dikuasai oleh China ataupun AS tetapi tidakkah anda sedari bahawa negara Sabah kini telah dan sedang dikuasai oleh malaya ataupun dalam erti kata lain yang lebih tepat, negara Sabah sedang dijajah oleh malaya melalui Resolusi Bangsa-Bangsa Bersatu (UN Resolution) 1541?

Keenam [6], ia merupakan isu yang telah dicipta sendiri oleh pemimpin malaya dan telah dijayakan oleh pemimpin-pemimpin negara Sabah (didalangi oleh USNO kemudian diteruskan oleh BERJAYA dan dirancakkan lagi oleh UMNO-BN sehingga kini) yang mementingkan diri, kuasa politik dan sanggup mengorbankan masa depan generasi masa depan negara ini. Tidakkah anda rasa tertampar pada muka dan malu apabila pihak kami mengatakan bahawa ia didalangi dan dirancakkan oleh parti yang dinaungi oleh anda kini? Ataupun anda sudah terlalu babal sehingga tidak mampu mengenal erti malu kerana sudah tegal dengan perbuatan parti anda ini? Sila jawab dalam hati.

Seperti yang tertera pada tajuk artikel ini, "Sabah akan terus berdepan dengan ketidakstabilan politik, keselamatan, ekonomi dan sosial jikalau terus berada dalam malaysia" adalah satu realiti dan bukan satu mimpi yang ngeri kerana ia isu ini sedang dialami oleh kita semua di negara Sabah. Untuk memberi noktah kepada isu ini, hanya melalui Kemerdekaan sebenar sahaja yang mampu menyelesaikannya yang mana bangsa Negara Sabah mempunyai kuasa mutlak dalam menangani isu ini. Apa yang berlaku kini ialah segala penyelesaian yang telah diberikan dan dikemukan untuk menyelesaikan isu ini tidak diambil berat oleh pihak kerajaan kerana tidak mendapat persetujuan oleh tuan mereka di malaya. Mengapa? Dengan selesainya isu ini, maka malaya akan kehilangan asas untuk terus menguasai bangsa dan Kerajaan Negara Sabah. 

Keadaan kini tidak seperti tahun 1960an yang mana rakyat dan pemimpin bergantung sepenuhnya kepada kepimpinan malaya. Kini, dimata rakyat Bangsa Negara Sabah, kepimpinan malaya adalah satu bentuk Parasitisme dan itu adalah realiti. malaya mendapat faedah daripada penipuan persekutuan ini manakala negara Sabah dan negara Sarawak mendapat kerugian kerana hasil kekayaan bumi tidak dapat dinikmati sepenuhnya. Segala aspek pembangunan dan kemajuan dikawal ketat oleh malaya. Tidakkah perkara seperti ini sangat muda dilihat dengan jelas bagi mereka yang berfikiran waras, matang dan bertanggungjawab?

Walau bagaimanapun, keadaan kini kian berubah dan gelombang kesedaran kian bertiup kencang untuk menghalau dakyah kotor, jijik, hina malaya daripada bumi Borneo ini. Rakyat negara Sabah khususnya sudah mampu menilai perkara ini dengan baik sekali. PRU14 bakal mengubah landskap politik di Borneo ini kerana pihak kami akan memainkan peranan dalam membuka mata rakyat agar mampu melihat dengan jelas keadaan ini. Namun, jikalau rakyat masih memilih untuk membutakan mata mereka, memekakkan telinga serta membisukan mulut, itu hak mereka tetapi ingatlah bahawa perbuatan tersebut bakal memberi kesan yang buruk kepada cucu-cicit anda dimasa hadapan. Kesenangan yang dinikmati kini oleh anda tidak bermaksud dapat diwariskan selamanya kerana ini amat bergantung kepada bentuk kerajaan dan politik yang diamalkan. 

Kerajaan negara Sabah dan negara Sarawak mesti diserahkan dibawah tangan kepimpinan golongan Nasionalisme, Patriotisme yang bertanggungjawab dalam menjaga maruah, membawa pembangunan yang nyata dan menjaga kepentingan sosial, ekonomi dan politik dengan penuh intergriti dan saksama. Ianya mampu dilakukan dibawah Parti-parti Tempatan. 

Mari kita bersama-sama berikan sokongan kepada Parti-Parti Tempatan yang berjuang untuk bangsa Negara Sabah dan bangsa Negara Sarawak. Acuan politik Borneo bagai langit dan bumi jikalau dibandingkan dengan acuan politik malaya. Oleh itu, jangan biarkan acuan itu diubah atau diganggu. Perbetulkan acuan itu melalui perpaduan dan kesepakatan sebagai Bangsa Borneo, Bangsa Negara Sabah dan Bangsa Negara Sarawak yang berjiwa Merdeka dan Berdaulat!

Bersama-sama kita selamatkan masa depan Bangsa Kita!

Read More